**JAMB's Tough Stance on Malpractice: No Negotiation with Culprits Abroad** The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has made it clear that it will not be swayed by external pressures to engage individuals accused of examination malpractice, regardless of their location. According to JAMB's Registrar, Professor Ishaq Oloyede, matters of this nature fall squarely within the purview of law enforcement agencies. This stance was recently put to the test as some individuals allegedly involved in large-scale registration infractions and other forms of malpractice fled the country, only to return and seek dialogue to avoid prosecution. However, Oloyede remained resolute, emphasizing that the integrity of the examination system must not be compromised. While some have criticized JAMB's rigidity, Oloyede argued that public commentary on sensitive issues like this should not undermine established procedures or weaken accountability mechanisms. As he put it, "Politicians will always make political statements," but JAMB's duty is to uphold the law and protect the interests of innocent candidates. In a related development, JAMB has completed its decade-long automation process, marking a significant milestone in the country's central admission examination system. With the new system, question authors can now develop and submit questions remotely, eliminating the need for physical gatherings of examiners. This development is a welcome relief for Nigerian students, who have long suffered the consequences of examination malpractice. By eliminating the need for physical gatherings, JAMB has reduced the opportunities for malpractice and ensured a more level playing field for all candidates. In conclusion, JAMB's tough stance on malpractice is a reassuring signal that the board is committed to upholding the integrity of the examination system. While some may view this stance as rigid, it is clear that JAMB's primary concern is the protection of candidates' futures and the upholding of the law.