Federal Government College (FGC) Kano is at the centre of a legal dispute over a Public-Private Partnership involving about 33 hectares of its land—approximately 40 percent of the school's total area. The land has been allocated to Pluck Global Construction Company for a project aimed at upgrading infrastructure, including a sports complex and classroom renovations valued at N8.5 billion. However, the school's alumni association, FGCKOSA, has challenged the deal, citing concerns over transparency and valuation. The association estimates the value of the land at over N36 billion and has questioned whether the proposed development represents fair value for the institution. FGCKOSA has raised alarms about the long-term impact on the school's assets, environment, and future expansion, particularly given the school's status as a Unity School with a history of producing notable Nigerian figures. The group has called for clarity on the decision-making process and the roles of the Federal Ministry of Education and the private developer. As an alternative, FGCKOSA plans to launch a N5 billion alumni-funded development initiative to improve infrastructure without altering land ownership. The matter is now before the Federal High Court in Kano, where FGCKOSA has secured an interim injunction halting further action on the project. The association has also urged the Federal Government to review the arrangement. The Federal Ministry of Education and Pluck Global Construction Company have not issued public responses to the concerns.
The alumni of FGC Kano are challenging a government-backed land deal that values infrastructure upgrades at N8.5 billion while the land involved is estimated at N36 billion, raising questions about the balance of benefit. If the school's land is truly worth that amount, then ceding 40 percent of it for less than a quarter of its value risks locking current and future students out of space needed for security, recreation, and expansion. The existence of a planned N5 billion alumni-funded alternative suggests other options were available without requiring land concessions. This raises the question of why such a high-cost asset swap was pursued when a less costly, ownership-preserving option is already in motion.
💡 NaijaBuzz is an AI-assisted news aggregator. This content is curated from third-party sources — NaijaBuzz is not the original publisher and is not responsible for the accuracy of source reporting. The NaijaBuzz Take is AI-assisted editorial opinion only, not established fact. All persons mentioned are presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction. NaijaBuzz does not endorse the views expressed in source articles.
