Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke has deposed Oba Joseph Oloyede as Apetumodu of Ipetumodu following his conviction in the United States on charges of tax fraud and money laundering. The deposition, confirmed in a statement by governor's spokesperson Olawale Rasheed, was based on the Certified True Copy of the judgment from a court in Ohio. The document was received after the State Executive Council directed the Ministry of Local Government to formally request it last year, citing the need to base decisions on verified records rather than social media reports.
The deposition order, signed on May 7, 2026, cited the need to maintain peace, order, and the integrity of the royal institution. It stated that Oba Oloyede's guilty plea, public trial, and conviction had brought the stool of Apetumodu and the broader Obaship institution into disrepute. He was sentenced to 56 months in prison by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on August 26, 2025, for wire fraud, filing false tax returns, and monetary transactions involving criminally derived property. The governor's office declared the stool vacant and said procedures for appointing a new monarch would commence in due course.
Rasheed urged residents of Ipetumodu to remain peaceful and law-abiding during the transition. The statement emphasized that the government acted only after obtaining official court documentation. No interim ruler has been named, and the process for selecting a successor will follow established traditional and governmental guidelines. The deposition marks the first time a Nigerian monarch has been removed over a foreign criminal conviction in recent years.
Adeleke upholds due process by waiting for official court documents before acting, yet the same standard has not been applied in other cases involving local officials accused of corruption. Oba Oloyede's conviction in the US contrasts with the lack of consequences for some Nigerian officeholders despite domestic allegations. His 56-month sentence abroad raises questions about how such conduct would have been treated if prosecuted at home. The deposition offers no clarity on who benefits from the vacant stool or how succession will be managed.
Editorial note: AI-assisted opinion. All persons mentioned are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Full disclaimer →